Comments on: Hard Drive Reliability Stats for Q2 2015 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-stats-for-q2-2015/ Cloud Storage & Cloud Backup Fri, 13 Aug 2021 12:03:22 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: JBlythe https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-stats-for-q2-2015/#comment-323427 Tue, 22 Aug 2017 19:21:00 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=36441#comment-323427 This article just pushed me toward the HGST, away from the hyped and therefore tempting Barracuda. A failure of my Seagate external in a little over 2years, should of made it unnecessary for me to even compare, but glad I found this info.

]]>
By: jj https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-stats-for-q2-2015/#comment-317251 Fri, 25 Nov 2016 08:21:00 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=36441#comment-317251 First of all, thank you for sharing the data.

as I scan the raw data, I found that some of the hardware shows
“0,0,0,0,0,NA,0,0,0,NA,0,0,0,0,0,0,0”
or
in some cases show (for example)
,0,0,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,0,0,0,0,0,

both examples shows that hardware did not fail.

I wonder what happens during the period that “NA” appears???

please answer me as soon as possible

]]>
By: Ben Jolly https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-stats-for-q2-2015/#comment-316011 Wed, 19 Oct 2016 01:48:00 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=36441#comment-316011 In reply to leexgx.

@leexgx:disqus raid doesn’t detect bitrot by itself. it provides redundancy in case of disk failure.

that is why disk scrubbing is required to detect the flipped bit/s and then utilise the parity to correct it.

]]>
By: Daniel Hansson https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-stats-for-q2-2015/#comment-312251 Mon, 22 Aug 2016 19:08:00 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=36441#comment-312251 /s/wd/hgst/

]]>
By: Rodrigo Arena https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-stats-for-q2-2015/#comment-312221 Sun, 21 Aug 2016 17:14:00 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=36441#comment-312221 Hi guy… What about the Adata external hardrives? i want to buy the HV100 2 teras external hardrive, but i cannot find any source of information like this about that one.

does anyone have experience with that Hardrive? (Adata HV100)

]]>
By: Tesla3D https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-stats-for-q2-2015/#comment-308661 Thu, 02 Jun 2016 17:26:00 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=36441#comment-308661 In reply to Michele.

Seagate GoFlex 4 of 4 fail within 3 years. Always keep a backup.

]]>
By: Wyzak https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-stats-for-q2-2015/#comment-306851 Thu, 05 May 2016 06:58:00 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=36441#comment-306851 In reply to Ozfer.

We’ve replaced most of our Seagates with Toshibas and have had very little issues since.

]]>
By: Wyzak https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-stats-for-q2-2015/#comment-306841 Thu, 05 May 2016 06:55:00 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=36441#comment-306841 Yep, we stopped buying Seagates about 4 years ago due to their extremely high failure rate.

]]>
By: Dan McGuinness https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-stats-for-q2-2015/#comment-306531 Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:15:00 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=36441#comment-306531 This is awesome – thanks for continuing to share this data. It’s very hard to obtain good reliability data as a small consumer, but very helpful when purchasing drives with intent of long term data storage! Thanks again, and please keep the data coming :)

]]>