Comments on: Yes, Backblaze Just Ordered 100 Petabytes of Hard Drives https://www.backblaze.com/blog/400-petabytes-cloud-storage/ Cloud Storage & Cloud Backup Thu, 12 Aug 2021 13:40:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: Homey https://www.backblaze.com/blog/400-petabytes-cloud-storage/#comment-324852 Sun, 03 Dec 2017 23:39:00 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=77824#comment-324852 no matter how much I search I just cannot find a source to buy half a doz + drives of 6tb or higher. Seems retailers STILL persist in price fixing and the sheer variation in prices for the same item is staggering. Does the Backblaze masters know of a source to buy quantities of hard drives in a package deal – dare not call it large for 6 to 12 drives of 6tb perhaps higher, at least not after reading how many you lot just ordered (can’t help but wonder just how much YOU paid for each of the 12TB HE Drives

]]>
By: What’s the Best Solution for Managing Digital Photos and Videos? https://www.backblaze.com/blog/400-petabytes-cloud-storage/#comment-324808 Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:06:48 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=77824#comment-324808 […] have a bit of cred in this field, as we currently have hundreds of petabytes of digital media files in our data centers from users of Backblaze Backup and Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage. We want to make […]

]]>
By: Endpoint Backup Solutions for the Modern Enterprise https://www.backblaze.com/blog/400-petabytes-cloud-storage/#comment-324643 Tue, 07 Nov 2017 19:22:49 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=77824#comment-324643 […] customers are part of a a platform that has a 10+ year track record of innovation and over 400 petabytes of customer data already under […]

]]>
By: Alec Martin https://www.backblaze.com/blog/400-petabytes-cloud-storage/#comment-324514 Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:49:00 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=77824#comment-324514 In reply to iWinRar.

Keep in mind that Backblaze’s current purchase rate of about 200 PB/year is 0.04% of the global HDD market (469 EB in 2016). The HDD portion of the R&D budget of each of the 3 companies that make HDDs is many times greater than Backblaze’s total revenue. Western Digital has 80K employees, making it bigger than Nvidia, AMD, GlobalFoundries, Asus, and Facebook…combined.

]]>
By: Alec Martin https://www.backblaze.com/blog/400-petabytes-cloud-storage/#comment-324510 Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:52:00 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=77824#comment-324510 In reply to Oracles.

If you take the power draw of the drives (provided in the table in the article) and multiply by 60, you get something in the 300-550 watt range, whereas the CPU, ram, etc. should be less than 300W combined for the components used in the storage pod v6. So I’d estimate between 50% and 90% of the power used by a storage pod is used to power drives.

]]>
By: Alec Martin https://www.backblaze.com/blog/400-petabytes-cloud-storage/#comment-324509 Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:45:00 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=77824#comment-324509 In reply to Oracles.

It turns out to be the other way around, actually (I’m an engineer at Seagate, and I am not speaking on behalf of my employer). Most of the energy dissipated by a mechanical HDD is due to air resistance and spindle motor power electronics inefficiency. The “idle” power usage stats provided in the article are for drives with platters spinning, but no I/O going on. The huge difference between the power usage of helium drives vs. air-filled drives makes this evident: The ST8000*s in the table (6 platters in air, >7W idle) vs. the ST10000NM0086 (7 platters in helium, <5W idle). So more than 80% of the energy is used for spinning disks, and less than 20% running solid state electronics (within the drive itself, not including the host computer's electronics).

]]>
By: Oracles https://www.backblaze.com/blog/400-petabytes-cloud-storage/#comment-324489 Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:25:00 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=77824#comment-324489 In reply to Elliott Sims.

Oops, sorry, I should have been more clear by “solid state stuff” I meant the CPU, RAM, chipset, VRs and all the non-drive parts (didn’t mean to imply SSD). On my builds, the single NVMe SSD probably never uses more than 6-7 W, so maybe 2-3% of total system load when everything is breathing hard. I would imagine with your small CPU/RAM combo and Tons ‘o Drives configuration would reverse the equation.

]]>
By: Western Digital plans 40TB drives, but it’s still not enough - News Titans https://www.backblaze.com/blog/400-petabytes-cloud-storage/#comment-324479 Tue, 17 Oct 2017 23:25:02 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=77824#comment-324479 […] failures, uses hundreds of thousands of drives in its data centers. It just placed an order for 100 petabytes worth of disk storage, and it plans to deploy all of it in the fourth quarter of this year. And it […]

]]>
By: Elliott Sims https://www.backblaze.com/blog/400-petabytes-cloud-storage/#comment-324478 Tue, 17 Oct 2017 22:57:00 +0000 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/?p=77824#comment-324478 In reply to Oracles.

I’m not sure on the exact ratios or wattages, but the hard drives themselves are definitely the clear majority of the power draw. They’re small individually, but multiplied by 45 or 60 it adds up. The CPU mostly just shuffles bits around plus some carefully-optimized Reed-Solomon and (AES-NI assisted) SSL, so it doesn’t need to be extremely powerful.

SSDs would make a huge difference in power, but they’re still something like 5x the price. We’re eagerly awaiting the day (well, year) when they get close enough to spinning-platter prices to be worth it :)

I don’t think our PSUs are Platinum, but they don’t really need to be: our power draw is relatively steady, so the PSUs can be sized precisely enough to stay around the narrower “optimal” range for gold/silver/bronze.

]]>